Your voice 📣 is power


This week: AI has made it dramatically easier to produce huge volumes of polished, middle-of-the-road content. So if we already know this to be true, why are so many people still letting AI flatten the very things that make their work worth reading?

Hi Reader

Nearly two decades ago, 19-year-old Harvard student Kaavya Viswanathan achieved the kind of success most aspiring writers only dream about. She landed a high-profile, six-figure book deal for her first novel, How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a Life. Movie rights were already in the works.

Then everything unraveled.

The Harvard Crimson published side-by-side comparisons showing passages strikingly similar to work by author Megan McCafferty. Viswanathan said she had read McCafferty’s books so many times that she had “internalized” some of the language. Then similarities to other authors surfaced.

Her publisher pulled the book. The movie deal disappeared.

This was 2006. Long before generative AI was writing novels. ChatGPT didn’t exist. The internet itself was still new enough that some people were still debating what terrible things it might unleash.

Meanwhile, humans had already figured out how to copy each other.

AI Didn't Invent Unoriginal Thinking

Today, we’re having a remarkably similar conversation about AI.

AI writing is generic. AI copies. AI makes it easier to plagiarize. AI is flooding the internet with garbage. There’s truth in all of that.

AI absolutely makes it easier to produce enormous amounts of content without contributing much original thought. But AI didn’t invent that problem.

What AI did was make it dramatically easier to produce huge volumes of polished, middle-of-the-road content. So if we already know this to be true, why are so many people still letting AI flatten the very things that make their work worth reading?

Why aren’t we adding more of our perspective? Our experiences? Our stories? Our voice?

For the past few years, much of the AI conversation has been built around one promise: save time. Write faster. Create faster. Produce more. And everyone jumped on the bandwagon. But somewhere along the way, “faster” started getting confused with “better.”

This is where I think a lot of people are using AI backwards.

We’re allowing AI to create a voice for us when we should be using it to amplify the voice we already have.

That’s what I’m digging into in this week’s article: Your Voice Is Power.

I look at why your point of view becomes more valuable as AI makes it easier for everyone to sound like an expert—and I share some practical ways to use AI without letting it strip away the very things that make people want to hear from you.

Read: Your Voice Is Power →

Monica

PS: Practical AI for Business Leaders starts Tuesday. If you’ve been meaning to join us, this is your last weekend to grab a seat.

Featured Post
​

Your Voice is Power​
​
Your voice has the power to move people to action. And yet, with generative AI, a remarkable number of people have stopped "finding" their voice. Instead they are giving it away. That’s a real tragedy.

Read: Your Voice Is Power →

Around the Blog

🔴 The AI Did It: Why Humanizing AI Hurts Everyone: Treating AI like a thinking or “rogue” being isn’t harmless. It’s becoming a shield for bad decisions, absent leadership, and weak systems.

🟡 How I Use AI in My Business: Less Complexity, More Relationships: Learn how I use AI to reduce business friction, strengthen relationships, manage knowledge, and build practical systems that support better human work.

🔵 What Does AI Know About Me? AI shapes the advice it gives you based on what it "thinks" it knows about you. Here's how to audit your AI's memory.

🟢 Monica Poling Named a Top-Five Finalist in Make’s Global AI Agents Challenge: Monica's Ask a Farmer Knowledge Engine was recognized by Make.com, a leading platform for business automation and AI-powered workflows.

What I'm Reading

🔴 AI Bros Are Having a Meltdown Because the Associated Press Stylebook Clarifies That AIs Don't Have Feelings: "In the midst of heated discussions on AI safety and consciousness, the Associated Press Stylebook has reminded everyone of where it stands on the whole “anthropomorphism” debate. This didn’t go over well in the world of AI experts and adherents, who called this a “completely insane” declaration. The article went on to compare AI advocaes to "cultish" behavior. [Futurism]

🟡 The Battle to Be Your Personal AI Agent Is Here: "These CEOs seem to be taking careful notes on the larger cultural backlash against generative AI, and they may have found their secret weapon: cuteness." [Wired]

🔵 AI’s Race to Transform the World: Can the Money Keep Coming? "...behind these impressive projections and high valuations are uncertain assumptions about productivity gains and profits, with economists noting there is little evidence to support these expectations. JP Morgan pointed out that broad-based productivity improvements in the US, a leader in AI, are still 'elusive,' raising doubts about the long-term sustainability of current investment levels. [Modern Diplomacy]

Practical AI for Business Leaders

I'm super excited about my upcoming cohort - Practical AI for Business Leaders - starting Oct. 6.

This live, four-week cohort is designed for executives, founders, and business leaders who want to use AI to create meaningful progress in their business —without losing their competitive advantage.

HURRY: The cohort starts Tuesday. If you want to participate, grab your seat now.